Competitiveness of the furniture industry products in the changed conditions: state and directions of providing at the federal and regional levels




furniture production, competitiveness factors, sales volume, shift in demand, sanctions


Recently the domestic furniture industry became a prospective industrial field in order to increase the competitiveness of products. In terms of this increasing there were upgrading of the technical base, the range of products, sales service, and delivery. We assess the issues and identify the forms of Russian furniture enterprises transformation to ensure their competitiveness in the conditions of import substitution. In the conditions of the import substitution and sanctions restrictions, we can see that Russian furniture producers have mastered the production of certain simple components. Also there is the development of the production of paints and coatings. For example, particle boards (fiberboard) in the early 2000s, with changes in import duties it turned out more profitable to organize the production of these products in Russia, as a result of which the need for them is completely covered by domestic producers. By the end of 2022, prices of the furniture products decreased by 10%. The reasons were: a reorientation from European to Turkish and Chinese manufacturers (who have lower prices); the lower prices of Russian materials (for example, particleboard). Since, the final product of domestic kitchen furniture production largely consists of imported components, the cost of products is very strongly influenced by the volatility of the ruble. And, of course, due to changes in logistics processes, transportation costs are becoming markedly higher. The paper analyzes these processes on a national scale and identifies the factors of competitiveness at the regional level.


Executive Order on Russia’s national development goals through 2030. (2020). Retrieved from (in Russian).

Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, National and Sub-national Innovation Systems–Complementarity and Economic Growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191–211. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00136-6.

Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56–67.

Cooke, P., & de Laurentis, C. (2010). Platforms of innovation: Some examples In P. Cooke, C. de Laurentis, S. MacNeill, C. Collinge (Eds.). Platforms of Innovation: Dynamics of New Industrial Knowledge Flows (рр. 271–310). London: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Baumol, W. (2003). Prize Lecture. Retrieved from

Klimanov, D., & Tretyak, O. (2019). Linking business model research and marketing: New network-based approach to business model analysis. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 34(1), 117–136.

Digital Attaché Program Information. (2016). Retrieved from

Digital Platforms: A Brief Introduction. (2021). Retrieved from

Geliskhanov, I. Z., & Yudina, T. N. (2018). Digital platform: a new economic institution. Quality–Access to Success, 19(S2), 20–26.

FTC. (2020). FTC Sues Facebook for Illegal Monopolization. Retrieved from

Kudrin told where the Russians should go to work. (2021). Retrieved from (in Russian).

Xiaomi is ditching humans in favor of robots. (2021). Retrieved from

Simachev, Y., Fedyunina, A., Yurevich, M., Kuzyk, M., & Gorodny, N. (2021). New Strategic Approaches to Gaining from Emerging Advanced Manufacturing Markets. FORSAYT, 15(3), 6–21 (in Russian).

Sberbank. (2023). Sberbank digital ecosystem. Retrieved from (in Russian).

Obukhova, E. (2021). Head of Marketplaces. Expert, (31–34), 78–79 (in Russian).

Online clubbers drive booze sales in China. (2020). Retrieved from

AI Russia. (2023). AI Russia Works. Retrieved from (in Russian).

UNCTAD. (2023). How COVID-19 triggered the digital and e-commerce turning point. Retrieved from




How to Cite

Margarita I. Berkovich, & Irina A. Soldatova. (2023). Competitiveness of the furniture industry products in the changed conditions: state and directions of providing at the federal and regional levels. JOURNAL OF REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS, 3(4), 70.