Institutions for cooperation between academic communities and governments in nation-wide planning: market economies vs the USSR




development economics, institutional economics, political economy of knowledge, think tanks, bureaucracy, competitive relationships


In this paper, the author defines the approaches to the analysis of interactions between representatives of academic and expert communities, and government authorities within national economy planning. These approaches are based on the theoretical literature, country and comparative studies, official electronic resources of government, academic, and expert organizations of a number of countries with market economies. The paper presents relevant country cases of institutionalized practices with such interactions. The author proposes the classification of subjects through the prism of economic science and political power, as well as effectiveness criteria of their interaction. By comparing these market economy practices with those of the USSR, the author outlines a number of historical models of the institutional interactions while shaping economic policy.


Afontsev, S. A. (2010). Political markets and economic policy. M.: KomKniga (in Russian).

Afontsev, S. A. (2017). Transforming Research Results into Policy Advice: Political Economy Perspective. Zhurnal novoj ekonomicheskoj associacii, (3), 192-198 (in Russian).

Aymes, J. F. L. (2014). Formation and Evolution of the Knowledge Regime and the Development Process in Korea. Korean Studies, 38, 91-123.

Bos, F. (2008). The Dutch Fiscal Framework: History, Current Practice and the Role of the Central Planning Bureau. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 8(1), 7-48. Retrieved from

Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2014). The National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany and Denmark. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2015). Policy ideas, knowledge regimes and comparative political economy. Socio-Economic Review, 13(4), 679–701. DOI:

De Wolff, P., & Van der Linden, J. T. J. M. (1988). Jan Tinbergen: A quantitative Economist. Review of Social Economy, 46(3), 312-325.

Didenko, D. V. (2019). State strategic planning experience in the USSR in theoretical and empirical studies. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 12(5), 211-228. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.5.65.14.

Feldman, G. A. (1928). On the theory of national income rates. Planovoe khoziaistvo, (11), 146-170; (12), 151-178. (in Russian). Eng. transl.: Foundations of Soviet Strategy for Economic Growth: Selected Soviet Essays, 1924-1930. N. Spulber (Ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1964. 174-199.

Hu, A. (2013). The Distinctive Transition of China’s Five-Year Plans. Modern China, 39(6), 629-639.

Isabelle, G. (2018). Mandatory Planning versus Indicative Planning? The Eastern Itinerary of French Planners (1960s-1970s). Planning in Cold War Europe: Competition, Cooperation, Circulations (1950s-1970s). M. Christian, S. Kott, O. Matějka (Eds.). (pp. 71-96). Berlin – Boston: De Gruyter.

Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.

Kindleberger, C. P. (1967). French Planning. National Economic Planning. M.F. Millikan (Ed.). (pp. 279-303). Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research.

Kirby, W. C. (1990). Continuity and Change in Modern China: Economic Planning on the Mainland and on Taiwan, 1943-1958. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 24, 124-136.

Li, C. (2009). China’s New Think Tanks: Where Officials, Entrepreneurs, and Scholars Interact. China Leadership Monitor, (29). Retrieved from

Luedde-Neurath, R. (1988). State Intervention and Export-oriented Development in South Korea. (pp. 68-112). Developmental States in East Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Maiti, S. (2013). Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, and National Planning, 1947-1958. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 74, 1019-1024. Retrieved from

Menon, N. (2018). ‘Fancy Calculating Machine’: Computers and planning in independent India. Modern Asian Studies, 52(2), 421-457. Retrieved from

Mitrokhin, N. (2020). Who and how planned the Soviet economy after Khrushchev. The Department of planning and financial institutions of the CPSU CC apparatus in 1965-1985. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, (5), 218-229 (in Russian).

Mo, J. (2005). Think Tanks and Good Governance: The KDI Story. HGCY Working Paper. (05-04). Retrieved from

Moore, M. (1988). Economic Growth and the Rise of Civil Society: Agriculture in Taiwan and South Korea. (pp. 113-152). Developmental States in East Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Maddison Project Database, version 2018. Bolt J., Inklaar R., de Jong H., & van Zanden J.L. (2018). Rebasing ‘Maddison’: New income comparisons and the shape of long-run economic development. Maddison Project Working. Paper, 10. Retrieved from

Myrdal, G. (1975). Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel, March 17. Retrieved from

Popov, V. (2014). Mixed Fortunes: An Economic History of China, Russia, and the West. New York: Oxford University Press.

Prados de la Escosura, L. (2015). World Human Development: 1870-2007. Review of Income and Wealth, 61(2), 220-247. Retrieved from

Safronov, A. V. (2019). The Gosplan Automated Planning System as a Necessary Step Toward the Nationwide Automated Data Processing and Control System (NACS). Ekonomicheskaia istoriia, 15(4), 395-409 (in Russian).

Safronov, A. V. (2020). Computerization of the Planned Economy in the USSR: Projects of Scientists and the Needs of Practitioners. Sotsiologiia nauki i tekhnologii, 11(3), 22-41 (in Russian).

Shatalin, S. S. (Ed.). (1972). Issues of macroeconomic models application to planning. Proceedings of the Soviet-French Symposium, October 11-15, 1971, Paris. M.: Progress (in Russian).

Stinsky, D. (2018). A Bridge between East and West? Gunnar Myrdal and the UN Economic Commission for Europe, 1947-1957. Planning in Cold War Europe: Competition, Cooperation, Circulations (1950s-1970s). M. Christian, S. Kott, O. Matějka (Eds.). (pp. 45-68). Berlin – Boston: De Gruyter.

Tsurutani, T. (1986). Academics in Japan’s Advisory Council System: The Ambiguity and Danger in their Role. Administration & Society, 18(1), 91-109.

Van Leeuwen, B., Didenko, D., & Földvári, P. (2015). Inspiration versus perspiration in the economic development of the Former Soviet Union and China (Ca. 1920–2010). Economics of Transition, 23(1), 213-246.

Wade, R. (1988) State Intervention in 'Outward-looking' Development: Neoclassical Theory and Taiwanese Practice. Developmental States in East Asia. (pp. 30-67). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

White, G. & Wade R. (1988). Developmental States and Markets in East Asia: An Introduction. Developmental States in East Asia. (pp. 1-29). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

White, G. (1988). State and Market in China's Socialist Industrialisation. Developmental States in East Asia. (pp. 153-192). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wickham, S. (1963). French Planning: Retrospect and Prospect. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 45(4), 335-347.




How to Cite

Didenko, D. V. (2021). Institutions for cooperation between academic communities and governments in nation-wide planning: market economies vs the USSR. JOURNAL OF REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS, 5(4), 69-81.