сотрудник
Ярославль, Ярославская область, Россия
сотрудник
Ярославль, Ярославская область, Россия
The socio-economic inequality of the Russian Federation entities generates digital inequality, and affects the competitiveness of the agglomerations. The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of digital inequality on the Russian regions competitiveness level. The direct connection between the levels of ICT development and regional competitiveness is the hypothesis of the study. Therefore, regions with the similar characteristics of ICT development will have the same competitiveness level. We use the cluster analysis to test the hypothesis. As a result of the research, we confirm the hypothesis, according to the data characterizing the Russian economy in a four-year time interval.
Socio-economic inequality of regions, regional competitiveness, entities of the Russian Federation, cluster analysis, ICT development, digital divide.
1. Shkiotov, S. V. (2022) Assessing the relationship between the level of competitiveness of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and the quality of life of the population. Economics and Entrepreneurship, (10), 593-598 (in Russian).
2. Polyakova, A., Kolmakov, V., & Yamova, O. (2019). Regional competitiveness response to innovation changes: Issues of evaluation. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 11(2), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.37043/JURA.2019.11.2.3
3. Naibaho, M. (2021). Regional Innovation Policy in Encouraging Regional Competitiveness in South Tangerang City. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(2), 269-279. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.269-279
4. Zinovyeva, I. S., Kozenko, Y., Gerasimov, K. B., Dubova, Y. I., & Irizepova, M. S. (2016). Regional innovation development as a feature of competitiveness in the XXI century. Contemporary Economics, 10(4), 333-342. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.220
5. Petronela, N. A., & Cojanu, V. (2013). Supporting regional competitiveness through innovation. Case study: Sud muntenia. Journal of International Studies, 6(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2013/61/4
6. Seppänen, S. K. (2008). Regional Innovation Systems and Regional Competitiveness: An Analysis of Competitiveness Indexes. DRUID-DIME Academy Winter 2008 PhD Conference on Geography, Innovation and Industrial Dynamics, (January), 1-27. Retrieved from http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper. php?id=2033&cf=28
7. Sabatino, M., & Talamo, G. (2017). Innovation and Competitiveness of European Regions. Research in Applied Economics, 9(3), 45. https://doi.org/10.5296/rae.v9i3.11642
8. Csete, M. S., & Barna, O. (2021). Hungarian regional climate change policy documents and climate innovation as a support tool for competitiveness and sustainable regional development is not recognised. Assessment of regional climate innovation potential in Hungary. International Journal of Global Warming, 25(3–4), 378-389. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2021.119007
9. The competitiveness index of Russian regions AV RCI – 2018. https://lc-av.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/LC-AV.RCI-2018 181021.pdf
10. The competitiveness index of Russian regions AV RCI – 2019. https://lc-av.ru/wp content/uploads/2019/11/AV_RCI_2019_beta.pdf
11. The competitiveness index of Russian regions AV RCI – 2020. https://lc-av.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AV-RCI-2020-alfa-200219.pdf
12. The competitiveness index of Russian regions AV RCI – 2021. https://stratplan.ru/UserFiles/Files/ AV%20RCI%202021a_210524.pdf
