Тула, Тульская область, Россия
The article considers the problem of developing a methodology for express assessment of investment attractiveness of territories of a region in conditions of incomplete information about the indicators for assessing the territory or the complexity of their formalisation. We use the methodology based on an expert assessment of the macroeconomic factors of the region and their processing using the tools of the hierarchy analysis method by T. Saati. The study allows for a sufficiently reliable numerical assessment of the attractiveness of individual territories in the region and the construction of a scale of their priority. The study dwells on the steps involved in assessing the investment attractiveness of a site by means of hierarchy analysis and proposes the basic criteria for assessing the territories of the regions. It contains the examples of the construction of pairwise comparison matrices. The paper makes conclusions on the integral indicator data, and a competitiveness (priority) ranking scale of territories is constructed based on the objective set. The express methodology of assessing the investment attractiveness of the territory presented in the article allows to analyze and assess the factors of the territory, justify the decision-making in conditions of uncertainty of the assessing factors, develop an integrated indicator of competitiveness of the analyzed territories of the region, make a rating scale of their priority for the investment prospects and development plans of the territory.
INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS, TERRITORY COMPETITIVENESS, HIERARCHY METHOD, PAIRWISE RELATIONSHIP MATRIX, TERRITORY EVALUATION CRITERIA, EVALUATION METHODOLOGY, INTEGRAL CRITERION, RATING SCALE, POLYGON METHOD, "IDEAL POINT" METHOD, RANKING METHOD, LINGUISTIC EVALUATION SCALE
1. Ataeva, N. Y. (2015). Research in the investment attractiveness of municipalities. Voprosy territorial’nogo razvitiya, (3), 1-12. Retrieved from http://vtr.isert-ran.ru/article/1485 (accessed 10.05.2022) (in Russian).
2. Baronov, G. O. (2017). The impact of a project management system on the investment attractiveness of a region. Ekonomika i socium, 1-1(32), 168-175 (in Russian).
3. Valinurova, L. S. (2017). Developing a system of controlling the investment attractiveness of a municipality. Ekonomika i upravlenie, (4), 132-135 (in Russian).
4. Vologdin, E. V. (2017). Evaluation of the region’s investment attractiveness: theory and practice (on the example of Altai Krai). Barnaul: Izd-vo AltGU. Retrieved from https://docplayer.com/78836966-E-v-vologdin-ocenka-investicionnoy-privlekatelnosti-regiona-teoriya-i-praktika-na-primere-altayskogo-kraya.html (accessed 01.05.2022) (in Russian).
5. Glazyrin, M. V. (2014). On Creating a System of Integrated Municipal Development. Ekonomist, (3), 79-84 (in Russian).
6. Emelyanov, Y. S., & Leonova, Y. Y. (2016). On Indicators of Assessing Investment Attractiveness of Russian Regions. Upravlencheskie nauki v sovremennom mire, 2(2), 501-506 (in Russian).
7. Zhukov, R. A., Vasina, M. V., Soboleva, D. V., & Polyakov, V. A. (2018). Formation of a system of views on the process of managing the sustainable development of the region. Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika, 6(6), 48-53 (in Russian).
8. Zhukov, R. A., Vasina, M. V., Soboleva, D. V., & Polyakov, V. A. (2018). Optimal management as a factor of sustainable development of industrial socio-economic systems. Samoupravlenie, (S1), 64-66 (in Russian).
9. Zhukov, R. A., Vasina, M. V., Soboleva, D. V., & Polyakov, V. A. (2018). Some aspects of economic evaluation of sustainable development of the regions of the Central Federal District and Tula Region. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, (3-1), 3-11 (in Russian).
10. Ivanov, D. V., & Sokolitsyn, A. S. (2018). Assessing the investment attractiveness of municipalities. Ekonomika i upravlenie narodnym hozyajstvom, (2), 43-49 (in Russian).
11. Kosobutskaya, A. Y., & Ravuanjirina, A. V. (2019). Investment attractiveness of the region: assessment methods. Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie, (1), 32-37 (in Russian).
12. Litvinova, V. V. (2013). Investment attractiveness and investment climate of the region. M.: Finansovyi universitet (in Russian).
13. Narolina, Y. V. (2009). Investment potential and investment risk as the main components of the region’s investment attractiveness. Vestnik TGU, (12), 137-143 (in Russian).
14. Nagaev, S., & Woergoetter, A. (1995). Regional Risk Rating in Russia. Vienna: Bank Austria AG. Econ. dep.
15. National Rating Agency. (2021). Rating of investment attractiveness of Russian regions. Retrieved from http://www.ra-national.ru/ru/ratings/provinces?type=rating (accessed 01.05.2022).
16. Panaseikina, V. S. (2011). Formation of a methodology for assessing the investment attractiveness of municipalities. Kontury global’nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, pravo, (4), 45-54 (in Russian).
17. Petrov, I. V. (2017). Review of methods for assessing the investment attractiveness of regions. Molodoi uchenyi, (23), 57-61 (in Russian).
18. Polyakov, V. A., Fomicheva, I. V., & Yudina, O. V. (2021). The choice of commercial real estate for business according to the technology of the hierarchy analysis method. Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ekonomika, (1), 12-16 (in Russian).
19. Saaty, T. (1993). Decision Making. The method of hierarchy analysis. M.: Radio i svyaz’ (in Russian).
20. Sandu, I. S., Bogoviz, A. V., Ryzhenkova, N. E., & Troshin, A. S. (2016). Methodological provisions for assessing the innovation and investment attractiveness of regions. Gosudarstvennyi audit. Pravo. Ekonomika, (4), 78-85 (in Russian).
21. Suglobov, A. E., & Morozov, I. A. (2016). Methodological support for assessing the investment attractiveness of the production potential of depressed regions. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, (1), 200-205 (in Russian).
22. Trachenko, M. B., & Dzhioev, V. A. (2018). Express analysis of investment attractiveness of regions. Financy i kredit, 24(9), 2151-2165 (in Russian).
